<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paging with different DBs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schneide.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/paging-with-different-dbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schneide.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/paging-with-different-dbs/</link>
	<description>public business secrets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: toncidamjanic</title>
		<link>http://schneide.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/paging-with-different-dbs/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toncidamjanic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schneide.wordpress.com/?p=393#comment-610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SQL Server 2005/2008:

WITH NumberedItems AS (
    SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY i.Id ASC) AS Rowumber, i.*
        FROM Items i
)
SELECT *
    FROM NumberedItems
    WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN @Start AND @End]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SQL Server 2005/2008:</p>
<p>WITH NumberedItems AS (<br />
    SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY i.Id ASC) AS Rowumber, i.*<br />
        FROM Items i<br />
)<br />
SELECT *<br />
    FROM NumberedItems<br />
    WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN @Start AND @End</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emiliano</title>
		<link>http://schneide.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/paging-with-different-dbs/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emiliano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schneide.wordpress.com/?p=393#comment-194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miq: off course i would like too a tool (ORM or another tool if exists) that allow me to migrate easily to multiples DBMS, but i think that not exists such of thing. The only way we have its sometimes rewrite code and &quot;hope&quot; that work in every DMBS as posible.
Reggards, Emiliano.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miq: off course i would like too a tool (ORM or another tool if exists) that allow me to migrate easily to multiples DBMS, but i think that not exists such of thing. The only way we have its sometimes rewrite code and &#8220;hope&#8221; that work in every DMBS as posible.<br />
Reggards, Emiliano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miq</title>
		<link>http://schneide.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/paging-with-different-dbs/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schneide.wordpress.com/?p=393#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Emiliano: Thanks for your comment. Imho one of SQLs purposes is to abstract from the actual implementation of the DBMS. In reality there are differences between the different systems but I like the idea that you actually can migrate to another DBMS. In such a case you want to have and use a standard solution and not change your software because of the database.
My comment about the Oracle &quot;mess&quot; was partly because the solution has many pitfalls and is much more complex than the other implementations.

Best regards,
Miq]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Emiliano: Thanks for your comment. Imho one of SQLs purposes is to abstract from the actual implementation of the DBMS. In reality there are differences between the different systems but I like the idea that you actually can migrate to another DBMS. In such a case you want to have and use a standard solution and not change your software because of the database.<br />
My comment about the Oracle &#8220;mess&#8221; was partly because the solution has many pitfalls and is much more complex than the other implementations.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Miq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emiliano</title>
		<link>http://schneide.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/paging-with-different-dbs/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emiliano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schneide.wordpress.com/?p=393#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with you.
The way to paging with Oracle its how you describe using ROWNUMBER() and there is no &quot;mess&quot; because every RDBMS has his own way to do this.
In Sql Server 2005 you can use ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY field ASC) similar to the oracle way.
Reggards, Emiliano.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with you.<br />
The way to paging with Oracle its how you describe using ROWNUMBER() and there is no &#8220;mess&#8221; because every RDBMS has his own way to do this.<br />
In Sql Server 2005 you can use ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY field ASC) similar to the oracle way.<br />
Reggards, Emiliano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
